Richmond as Subject: Notes on Photographing a City You Know

There is a tendency among photographers to treat the familiar as exhausted. The places you walk through every week, the streets you’ve lived on for years, the buildings you’ve seen in every season — these get categorized as too known to photograph well. The interesting work, the argument goes, is somewhere else. New cities. New countries. New light.

This is wrong, but it takes time to learn that it’s wrong.

What Familiarity Actually Gives You

The advantage of working in a city you know is not that you’ve seen everything in it. The advantage is that you’ve seen the same things repeatedly, in different conditions, and you’ve developed a memory for what’s worth returning to. You know which alley in Shockoe Bottom catches afternoon light on the east-facing brick. You know which warehouse window in Manchester gets reflected sun in late November but not in December. You know which corner of which interior you’ve walked past forty times has been waiting, the whole time, for the right combination of weather and time to be photographable.

A photographer traveling through a city for a week cannot accumulate that information. They can produce beautiful work — sometimes work no resident could match — but they cannot produce the kind of work that emerges from sustained attention to a small geography over years.

The Subjects Richmond Provides

Richmond, Virginia has a specific advantage for the kind of photography I work in. The city has layers — colonial-era buildings, industrial structures from the late 1800s, mid-century commercial architecture, residential interiors that have been continuously occupied for a century or more. None of these layers have been fully erased. They sit next to each other, sometimes within the same block. The result is a visual environment dense with the kinds of surfaces I find worth photographing: aging brick, oxidized metal, paint that has gone through three or four color schemes, plaster that has been patched and repatched.

The light in Richmond has its own quality. The latitude produces long shadows in winter and short, harsh shadows in summer. The humidity in summer softens everything. The James River reflects light up into the buildings on its banks in ways that change throughout the day and across the seasons. These are not exotic conditions, but they are specific. They reward photographers who learn to read them.

How a Local Practice Develops

A local photographic practice doesn’t begin with the intention to document a city. It begins with photographing what’s nearby because it’s nearby, and then noticing patterns in what you keep returning to. The patterns are what reveal the subject. For me, the patterns have been clear for some time: I photograph industrial remnants, transitional interiors, and the way indirect light falls across worn surfaces. Richmond happens to be where I encounter those subjects most consistently, so Richmond becomes the location of the work.

This is different from setting out to photograph “Richmond” as a topic. Topic-driven work tends to produce images that illustrate the topic. Pattern-driven work, sustained over years in a specific geography, produces images that document a way of seeing — and the geography emerges as a byproduct.

The Long Project

The work I’m currently doing in Richmond is unstructured in the sense that there is no defined end point, but disciplined in the sense that it follows a method. I revisit locations across seasons. I keep records of where I’ve been, what film stock I used, what the light was doing. When I see an interior that interests me, I make a note to return to it under different conditions. Some interiors get photographed once and then archived. Some get photographed five or six times before a final print emerges.

The point is not to document the city comprehensively. It would be impossible, and the attempt would produce inventory rather than photography. The point is to use the city as the working environment for a long-term practice — to let the place provide the material, and to let the discipline of the practice determine what survives into a finished print.

Why This Matters for Anyone Working Locally

There is no shortage of photography about other places. Travel photography fills every platform. What there is a shortage of is photography that emerges from years of patient attention to a single place — work that could not have been made by someone passing through, because it depends on knowledge that takes years to acquire.

If you live in a city, that city is offering you a long project. The work is harder than it looks. The advantage is real, but only if you take it.

About the practice → /services/
About Jens Mauthe → /about/